History
History, 12.11.2019 01:31, sairaanwar67

Vietnam speech (1965)
lyndon b. johnson
. . over this war, and all asia, is the deepening shadow of communist china. the rulers in hanoi are urged on by peking. this is a regime which has destroyed freedom in tibet, attacked india, and been condemned by the united nations for aggression in korea. it is a nation which is the forces of violence in almost every continent. the contest in vietnam is part of a wider pattern of aggressive purpose.

why are these realities our concern? why are we in south vietnam? we are there because we have a promise to keep. since 1954 every american president has offered support to the people of south vietnam. we have to build, and we have to defend. thus, over many years, we have made a national pledge to south vietnam defend its independence. and i intend to keep our promise. to dishonor that pledge, to abandon this small and brave nation to its enemy, and to the terror that must follow, would be an unforgivable wrong.

we are also there to strengthen world order. around the globe, from berlin to thailand, are people whose well-being rests, in part, on the belief that they can count on us if they are attacked. to leave vietnam to its fate would shake the confidence of all these people in the value of american commitment, the value of america’s word. the result would be increased unrest and instability, and even wider

peace with honor (1973)
richard nixon
must recognize that ending the war is only the first step toward building the peace. all parties must now see to it that this is a peace that lasts, and also a peace that heals—and a peace that not only ends the war in southeast asia but contributes to the prospects of peace in the whole world.

this will mean that the terms of the agreement must be scrupulously adhered to. we shall do everything the agreement requires of us, and we shall expect the other parties to do everything it requires of them. we shall also expect other interested nations to insure that the agreement is carried out and peace is

which statement best describes these speeches made by president johnson (1965) and president nixon (1973) regarding the vietnam war?
a) johnson explains the reason for u. s. involvement, while nixon explains the need to end the war.
b) johnson says the u. s. should stop their enemies, while nixon explains why the war should continue.
c) johnson explains how the u. s. will attack vietnam, while nixon explains how vietnam will attack the u. s.
d) johnson believes the vietnamese will attack the u. s., while nixon believes the u. s. should attack vietnam.

answer
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 20:10, nev322
Many asian immigrants came to the united states in the 1960s and 1970s because of push factors, including the possibility of religious freedom. economic opportunities. the chance of family reunions. o poverty and chaos.
Answers: 1
image
History, 21.06.2019 21:00, gael6529
What was the government purpose for creating “day schools”
Answers: 2
image
History, 22.06.2019 04:30, deeboss177
What anti-semitic policies enforced by the nazi party
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 05:30, floydsidney1119
Which aspect of the postwar era did jazz’s liveliness, looseness, and improvisation most reflect?
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
Vietnam speech (1965)
lyndon b. johnson
. . over this war, and all asia, is the deepeni...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Business, 14.04.2020 19:22