Hurrryyy
how did the obama administration change us policy regarding cuba?
it eased restrictions on communication, travel, and exports.
it imposed sanctions in response to nuclear testing.
it created programs to fight violence there.
it intervened in an uprising to aid pro-democracy rebels.

The correct answer is: It eased restrictions on communication, travel, and exports.

Indeed, Obama did not have enough support of a republican-led Congress to completely get rid of the embargo. Therefore, he decided to render it moot by lifting as many restrictions he could on essential items such as communication (mail, telephone, internet), travel (tourism, humanitarian) and exports. This is now known as the Cuba thaw. However, when the Democrats lost the elections in 2016 and Trump became president he decided to completely backtrack on this policy.

economic competition is inefficient and wasteful.good luck

explanation:

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is