Alocal politician says the government shouldn’t waste money on reforestation because it doesn’t work. to support his claims he uses this graph which shows the trend of deforestation and reforestation in africa, south america, and asia. why doesn’t this graph strongly support his argument

D is the correct answer.

The chart that the politician put up shows a more complicated story than what they would perhaps like to tell.

The chart shows successes and failures and a prudent response would to be ask why Asia shows such success in terms of reforestation.

I believe it is C but I'm not sure, sorry if I got this wrong for you all.

Explanation:

explanation: we can only guess at how our actions may be perceived in the future. doing something really big like killing lots of people, saving lots of people, affecting the lives of lots of people is a sure fire way of being remembered in historical records. we can also make a difference in the history records by being a small influence on something bigger, whether that is as a civil servant, scientist or artist.

of course you could argue that we all affect history just as tiny cogs in a   bigger machine.

if you mean how do people influence our opinions of things which have already happened, then simply by writing a book which looks at things form a different perspective and trying to convince people that this perspective is more accurate or truthful. people do it all the time i.e. richard the third was a terrible or was he? plenty would disagree, it's just that their views aren't the most widely known.n:

the perimeter of a triangle is 69 cm. side a is 5 cm shorter than side b. side c is twice as long as side a. find the length of each side. i need to know how to do it in 2 equations.  

equations:

a = b-5

c = 2a

a + b + c = 69