William sumner and andrew carnegie differ from each other in what way?

Sumner's position on imbalance contrasts from that of Andrew Carnegie, who trusted it was the duty of the rich to appropriate their abundance riches for the benefit of society.

What's more, Carnegie trusted that disparity was an inescapable result of social advancement outside human ability to control.

Sumner was a supporter of the hypotheses of Social Darwinism and was a solid defender of free enterprise private enterprise.

hhj

explanation:

hjhj

in his book, the riddle of the rosetta stone, james giblin talks about how there was a young british polymath and physician named thomas young who made a lot of advances on the deciphering of the rosetta stone. he says that even though young made a lot of mistakes because he was working under false assumptions, he also made huge contributions like deciphering three out of the seven symbols (more than anyone else before him). young published his findings and continued his good work but he wasn't able to progress much further due to some unfavorable situations, he still laid the basis for many other scholars and of course for the man who has been generally known to have deciphered it, jean-françois champollion