History
History, 24.06.2019 01:30, lillybritn

(more than 1 questions= need fast ) (q.1)= who invented the following? : the method of deductive reasoning ,the method of inductive reasoning , and the microscope? (q.2)= what two things made it possible for explorers to travel all over the world in sailing vessels? (multiple answer) a. new shipbuilding techniques b. discovery of the north star c. the compass d. gps navigation (q.3)= why did the ottoman empire dissolve? a. empire leaders decided it would be best if they became separate countries and ally with each other. b. joined forces with britain and france to create a powerful empire. c. it could no longer sell spices, and silk. d. it suffered a weakening economy, domestic revolts, and a loss to the allies in world war i. (q.4)= (multiple choice)the columbian exchange involved the widespread exchange of a. plants b. people c. gold and silver d. pathogens e. animal skins (q.5)= which ideas or inventions are attributed to sir isaac newton? ( multiple choice) a. geometry b. refracting telescope c. law of universal gravitation d. calculus e. three laws of mathematics f. three laws of motion (q.6) = identify some of the lasting achievements of the joseon dynasty in korea.(multiple choice) a. an encyclopedia b. elaborate korean gardens c. kites d. the second asian sundial e. the first water-powered clock

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 19:30, zoeycrew
In the decision for dred scott vs. sanford, (1857) in which a slave petitioned for his freedom in a st. louis court, on the grounds that his owner had taken him into free territory, and thus he ought no longer be regarded as possessing "slave" status, but should be regarded as a free man, the court decided as follows (excerpt): "in the circuit courts of the united states, the record must show that the case is one in which by the constitution and laws of the united states, the court had jurisdiction--and if this does not appear, and the court gives judgment either for plaintiff or defendant, it is error, and the judgment must be reversed by this court--and the parties cannot by consent waive the objection to the jurisdiction of the circuit court. a free negro of the african race, whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves, is not a 'citizen' within the meaning of the constitution of the united states. when the constitution was adopted, they were not regarded in any of the states as members of the community which constituted the state, and were not numbered among its 'people or citizen.' consequently, the special rights and immunities guarantied to citizens do not apply to them. and not being "citizens" within the meaning of the constitution, they are not entitled to sue in that character in a court of the united states, and the circuit court has not jurisdiction in such a suit. the only two clauses in the constitution which point to this race, treat them as persons whom it was morally lawful to deal in as articles of property and to hold as slaves. since the adoption of the constitution of the united states, no state can by any subsequent law make a foreigner or any other description of persons citizens of the united states, nor entitle them to the rights and privileges secured to citizens by that instrument." why does the court say that the petitioning party in this case had no right to sue for his freedom? a) because he is too young b) because he is from a different state c) because he is "of the african race" with enslaved ancestors d) because he is, properly speaking, within his owner's jurisdiction
Answers: 1
image
History, 21.06.2019 20:30, weeblordd
Match each treaty with its description. treatys- a the munich agreement b the pact of steel c the molotov-ribbentrop pact descriptions- 1- an alliance between germany and italy 2- an agreement between germany and the soviets dividing eastern europe 3-an agreement between germany, france, italy, and britain granting germany a small part of czechoslovakia in return for peace
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 01:30, aleanroverto723
Which act of the conquistador pizarro was crucial in overthrowing the inca? a. the destruction of the ancient inca city, machu picchu b. the siege of the inca capital near the cuzco valley c. the execution of the last inca ruler, atahualpa d. the unexpected deaths of 3 million inca warriors e. the murder of former inca emperor, huascar
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 05:30, donny34
How did the opposing sides of the revolutionary war compare
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
(more than 1 questions= need fast ) (q.1)= who invented the following? : the method of deductive re...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 30.09.2019 04:00
Konu
Mathematics, 30.09.2019 04:00