Douglass’s account is written in 1881, twenty-two years after the raid. do you trust his account? why or why not?

Nowadays, we know, thanks to science, that the human memory is very unreliable. When it comes to details specially, scientists found out that eyewitness remember so little of what is actually true and fill in the blanks with false details generated by the brain. This all when the witness is asked about what happened moments after the event.

Considering this knowledge, even though Douglas's account might be correct, it is very unlikely to be the case when it was written 22 years later.

So the answer is no, I do not trust his account.

latin america is a region of racial and cultural diversity.  it is a group of countries and dependencies in the americas where romance languages are predominant. the term originated in 19th century france as amérique latine to consider french-speaking territories in the americas along with the larger group of countries where spanish and portuguese languages prevailed.

explanation:

d is the answer. leo should include the source.