Iwill give brainliest for the correct answer! read the passage below. then answer the question that follows using information and evidence from the text. may 28, 1830 chapter cxlviii an act to provide for an exchange of lands with the indians residing in any of the states or territories, and for their removal west of the river mississippi. be it enacted by the senate and house of representatives of the united states of america, in congress assembled, that it shall and may be lawful for the president of the united states to cause so much of any territory belonging to the united states, west of the river mississippi, not included in any state or organized territory, and to which the indian title has been extinguished, as he may judge necessary, to be divided into a suitable number of districts, for the reception of such tribes or nations of indians as may choose to exchange the lands where they now reside, and remove there; and to cause each of said districts to be so described by natural or artificial marks, as to be easily distinguished from every other what is one research question that this document could you answer? explain how this document could answer that question.

This particular passage makes part of a document known as the Indian Removal Act of 1830 that was signed by U.S President Andrew Jackson. The point of this Act was to give the President of the United States leeway to make use of unsettled lands, with existing state borders, that lay west of the Mississippi river, to establish Indian citizens who gave up their lands peacefully for white settlement. One of the consequences of this Act was the famous Trail of Tears, which literally defined the forceful removal of the Cherokee tribes and the death of several of their members as they were moved to the west.

One research question that might arise from this particular passage is how the United States government at the time managed to control the conflicts that were arising between the Native Americans and the white people who were settling inside the territories of the Indians, particularly the Cherokee. This document helps to answer the question as it literally shows us what were the measures that the U.S government resorted to to resolve the issue in their favor and in detriment of the Native American tribes.

the answer would be a i think?

separation of powers, therefore, refers to the division of government responsibilities into distinct branches to limit any one branch from exercising the core functions of another.   the intent is to prevent the concentration of power and provide for checks and balances.  

the traditional characterizations of the powers of the branches of american government are:

* the legislative branch is responsible for enacting the laws of the state and appropriating the money necessary to operate the government.

* the executive branch is responsible for implementing and administering the public policy enacted and funded by the legislative branch.

* the judicial branch is responsible for interpreting the constitution and laws and applying their interpretations to controversies brought before it.

forty state constitutions specify that government be divided into three branches:   legislative, executive and judicial.   california illustrates this approach; "the powers of state government are legislative, executive, and judicial.   persons charged with the exercise of one power may not exercise either of the others except as permitted by this constitution."

while separation of powers is key to the workings of american government, no democratic system exists with an absolute separation of powers or an absolute lack of separation of powers. governmental powers and responsibilities intentionally overlap; they are too complex and interrelated to be neatly compartmentalized. as a result, there is an inherent measure of competition and conflict

minnesota:   minnesota house research,   separation of powers: when statutes and court rules conflict, 2005