M which statement correctly defines principalities in northern asia in the 1200s? 1.principalities were independent areas of the mongol empire. 2.principalities were territories just outside of the mongol empire. 3.principalities were small territories that were run by chinese rulers. 4.principalities were small territories that were run by russian rulers.

I believe the correct answer is option 4.Principalities were small territories that were run by Russian rulers.

Which statement correctly defines principalities in northern Asia in the 1200s? Principalities were small territories that were run by Russian rulers.

Hope I could help! :)

The correct answer is number 4. Principalities were small territories that were run by Russian rulers.

The statement that correctly defines principalities in Northeastern Asia in the 1200s is "Principalities were small territories that were run by Russian rulers."

In 1200, the name Russia had was simply Rus. ITs biggest cities were Kiev, Novgorod, and Vladimir. These were kind of principalities, not a big territory, but they had its rulers. So the statement that correctly defines principalities in Northeastern Asia in the 1200s is "Principalities were small territories that were run by Russian rulers."

option d is correct. corroborated sources of historical evidence   is necessary to validate a claim about an event in history.

historians tend to use written sources, but audio and visual materials as well as artifacts are important objects that supply information to modern historians.

historical sources are usually divided into two categories: primary and secondary sources. depending on the historian's intent, some sources shift their designation. determining what type of sources toimplement, and the level of credibility and reliability of those sources, is a significant step in critical thinking for the historian.

explanation:

was found at b)south carolina