Asap! to recruit civilians for the armed forces, allied and axis powers a- required all eligible males to enlist. b- held national lotteries for new recruits. c- expanded the age range for soldiers. d- told citizens it was their duty to serve.

The correct answer is: B: Held national lotteries for new recruits.

Explanation:

Both the Axis powers (Germany, Italy and Japan) and the Allies (United Kingdom, France, the United States, the Soviet Union and China), initiated processes that were almost historical for them in drafting recruits for the armies they would need to fight during World War II. The common denominator for them is that almost all, particularly the U.S., and Germany, initiated a series of conscription processes to enlist civilians into their armies in preparation for war. In the case of Germany, for example, Hitler established forceful conscription and lotteries for all men after 1935, and even established places within the forces for children and women. The United States, another example, instituted the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, with which required all men between the ages of 21 to 45 to register for a national draft. Then, the minimum age was lowered to those 18 and older. Similar movements were taken by countries of either band.

he risk-return relationship. generally, the higher the potential return of an investment, the higher the risk. there is no guarantee that you will actually get a higher return by accepting more risk. diversification enables you to reduce the risk of your portfolio without sacrificing potential returns.

explanation:

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.