Which action would most likely be considered constitutional under the precedent established in the regents of the university of california versus bakke supreme court decision

The case University of California v. Bakke was a case regarding racial quotas in universities. In this case, the US Supreme Court ruled that the university use of racial quotas was unconstitutional. But it would be constitutional the use of affirmative actions to accept minorities in some circumstances. This way, affirmative actions are constitutional and race can be considered one of the admissions factors.

the correct answer is the supreme court.this is because when a person was accused of a crime during rome they brought him to a place to decide his fate also known as a jury

well first we can compare on what the slave masters ate and what the slaves ate well the masters ate fancy great food like chicken rice mash potatose and stuff like that and slaves ate well food that your not suppost to eat like the weird parts of turkey and chicken and slaves master chilled beat and eat and slaves work get beat and get little of sleep there you go