Which areas do local governments in michigan control? what ones apply to this? parks and recreation military preparedness public works public safety local courts

The roles of local government in Michigan include the following:

-Public Safety: local governments decide how they will ensure that all its residents are safe in all senses of the word (law enforcement, health, living conditions, residential statutes, fire brigades, etc.).

-Parks and recreation: these are usually run by local townships which make sure that all citizens and visitors have access to activities in these areas with local programs. Local governments regulate use and maintenance for the programs and lands used for this purpose and liaise with local law enforcement and other agencies to ensure compliance with safety rules and regulations.

-Public works: local special assessments ensure that taxes are collected to fund the construction and maintenance of water and sewer systems, sidewalks, road and street improvements, garbage collection, street lights and recycling.

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is