What did the change in immigration policies between the 1920s and the 1960s reveal about the united states? the country was becoming more open to diversity and equality. the country was trying to maintain a uniform population. the country was not ready to act with equality and fairness. the country was exerting more control over the ethnicity of immigrants.

The correct answer is A. The country was becoming more open to diversity and equality

Explanation:

Throughout the history of the U.S. it has been common people migrate to the country to state permanently in it, indeed most of the current population in the U.S. are descendants of immigrants. Because of this, the government and immigration entities had created different policies to regulate the immigration, in the case of the 20th century from 1907 to 1920 different restrictions were imposed, indeed during this period of time the immigration from Asian countries was banned, along with the immigration of people with disabilities, homosexual people and anarchists and even people from certain sectors of Europe including Jews and Italians, which means immigration policies were really restrictive and even promoted discrimination.

But his policies were changed by 1960s as the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 and abolished the system previously used based on allowing or banning the immigration of people from certain countries, which means the restrictive and unequal policies ended, as new policies that promoted equality and diversity were established. Therefore, the change in immigration policies between the 1920s and 1960s reveal the United States "was becoming more open to diversity and equality" because the policies changed to avoid discrimination of people and restrictions of immigration from certain countries.

A

E2020

Explanation:

1) checks and balances- this idea is implemented in the constitution to ensure that no one branch of the federal government gains too much power. for example, the legislative branch(congress) can approve a bill that will then be sent to the executive branch (president). if the president does not like the bill or thinks that it violates the rights of citizens, he/she can veto the bill. vetoing the bill stops the bill from becoming a law. this check on power ensures that congress makes laws that do not violate the rights of citizens.

2) anti-federalists do not want to ratify the constitution unless it includes a bill of rights. the anti-federalists are worried that the constitution gives too much power to the federal government. having a strong central government caused problems when the us was still part of great britain. this is why the anti-federalists are fearful of this type of system.

3) federalists want a new constitution passed because it will fix america's weak political structure. before the us constitution is implemented, the constitution being used is known as the articles of confederation. this constitution has an extremely weak central government, allowing for disunity among the states.

can't do the whole thing, hope this

answer: look it up on quizlet thats where the answer was found

explanation: