In the film "epic 2015," the narrator describes the year 2015 as the "worst of times" because:

In the film, there are very interesting projections, the narrator describes the year 2015 as the "worst of times" because of innovations and the uncertain future of technology; like any large-scale innovation, forecasts are mere hunches. What's certain about the future of technology is that there will be a lot of competition, and increasingly complex services, depending on incredibly intelligent software based on state-of-the-art technology. Google is the best example of the convergence, where everything is concentrated or depends on the internet. And convergence in technology standards; the film shows a bit of how big technology companies have set standards for the internet. The EPIC means "Evolving Personalized Information Construct", and is the apex of the forecasts in which the film ends. Googlezon, where Google and Amazon come together, with an idea of ​​what might be possible in the future. It is terrifying to think about the future, the possibilities, the domain of giants in the technology market.

of the way that technology haven't work well

Explanation:

the governor can not veto a referendum that the voters approve

the vast majority of ballots have been counted nearly two weeks after one of the biggest political upsets in modern u.s. history catapulted donald trump to the presidency.

estimates show more than 58 percent of eligible voters went to the polls during the 2016 election, nearly breaking even with the turnout rate set during the last presidential election in 2012, even as the final tallies in states like california continue to be calculated, according to statistics collected by the u.s. elections project.

but among those figures were stark contrasts in key states that swing the election to trump — in ohio, wisconsin, iowa, michigan and elsewhere — indicating the president-elect’s leap from long-shot candidate to the most powerful political position in the world may have happened in part because of apathy toward hillary clinton’s candidacy, especially among the democratic base, several political scientists and organizations monitoring voter turnout told the pbs newshour.

while clinton is leading the popular vote by more than 1.5 million over trump as of sunday, she trails president obama’s 2012 totals by more than 2 million ballots — a chasm that may have cost her the election, said david becker, co-founder of the center for election and innovation and research.

“several million voters didn’t come out to vote,” becker said. “which is telling me that this idea of the trump wave, a huge number of voters shifting over to trump, is certainly not the story.”