In at least 150 words, reflect on the case of baker v. carr. do you believe the supreme court should have the authority to supersede decisions made at the state level?

In this case The Supreme Court decided that redistricting matters presented justiciable questions, enabling federal courts to to intervene and decide on these kind of cases; the defendants argued that redistricting is a political question that should not be for the federal courts to decide upon. At a close vote decision it was upheld that redistricting of is not a political question but a husticiable one.

i belive the classic sword and a shield would do