Supreme court justices who support judicial activism and those who support judicial restraint most disagree on the answer to which question?

The correct answer is D) to what extent should the Supreme Court work to promote social progress.

Supreme Court justices who support judicial activism and those who support judicial restraint most disagree on the answer to this question:  to what extent should the Supreme Court work to promote social progress?”

The Supreme Court of the United States was created to impart justice. Its roles are not to promote social progress. To do that, there are other branches such as the legislative branch or even the Executive Branch. So that is the point of view of those who support judicial restraint and the reason there are differences with those who support judicial activism.  

The other options or the question were, a) what is the value of concurring of opinions that agree with a majority opinion?, b) how should new justices be selected for the Supreme Court in the event of a vacancy?, and c) should the Supre Court rule in cases that have already been heard by a lower court?  

the berlin blockade was an international crisis that arose from an attempt by the soviet union, in 1948–49, to force the western allied powers (the united states, the united kingdom, and france) to abandon their post-world war ii jurisdictions in west berlin. in march 1948 the allied powers decided to unite their different occupation zones of germany into a single economic unit. in protest, the soviet representative withdrew from the allied control council. coincident with the introduction of a new deutsche mark in west berlin (as throughout west germany), which the soviets regarded as a violation of agreements with the allies, the soviet occupation forces in eastern germany began a blockade of all rail, road, and water communications between berlin and the west. on june 24 the soviets announced that the four-power administration of berlin had ceased and that the allies no longer had any rights there.