Which statement is supported by the data in the tables above? a. it would be less difficult to pass republican policy ideas through the senate between 2008 and 2010, compared to after the 2010 election. b. it would be less difficult to pass democratic policy ideas through the senate between 2008 and 2010, compared to after the 2010 election. c. it would be more difficult to pass democratic policy ideas through the house between 2008 and 2010, compared to after the 2010 election. d. it would be less difficult to pass republican policy ideas through the house between 2008 and 2010, compared to after the 2010 election. i think the answer is

It would be more difficult to pass Democratic policy ideas through the House between 2008 and 2010, compared to after the 2010 election.

yea C.

B. It would be less difficult to pass Democratic policy ideas through the Senate between 2008 and 2010, compared to after the 2010 election.

Explanation:

Between 2008 and 2010, the democratic party had 57 Senators in the senate, compared to the 51 they had after the elections of 2010, this means that it would be more difficult after 2010 to pass democratic policy ideas, having less senators from the democratic party in the senate.

`stare decisis is a legal doctrine that obligates courts to follow historical cases when making a ruling on a similar current or future case. stare decisis ensures that cases with identical facts be approached in the same way, unless overruled by the same court or a higher court such as the us supreme court. simply put, it binds courts to follow legal precedents set by previous decisions.

stare decisis is a latin term meaning "to stand by that which is decided".

d. it gave farmers a way to organize for more political power