Why was the issue of currency so important to americans in 1896? what was at stake?

The currency issue played a vital role in 1896 due to the economic depression in the United States which resulted in the division of parties within the Democrats and Republican parties in the presidential election leaving the country at stake. The elite-class people wanted the money with gold so as to maintain the value of the dollar high whereas the middle-class and poor-class people wanted the money with gold and silver and lower the value of the dollar. The recession hit many people leaving them jobless and several investors remained to be conservatives. The endless conflict between gold (Republican party) and silver (Democrats and some Republican people) group was detrimental to the economy as a whole. However, the silver group in Republican party supported secretly to “Silverite” democrats. The debate on gold and silver issue and the election campaign between Bryan Vs. Mc Kinley was shaking the economy weeks before the election day. Bryan's belief was that the gold money would crash America's economy while Mc. Kinley's view was that silver money would collapse the entire economy. The campaign between Bryan Vs. Mc Kinley was shaking the economy weeks before the election day. Bryan's belief was that the gold money would crash America's economy while Mc. Kinley's view was that silver money would collapse the entire economy. Therefore, the entire economy was at stake due to the currency issue and battle during presidential elections during 1896.

The money issue assumed an imperative job in 1896 because of the monetary gloom in the United States which brought about the division of gatherings inside the Democrats and Republican gatherings in the presidential race leaving the nation in question.  

Explanation:

The exclusive class individuals needed the cash with gold to keep up the estimation of the dollar high though the white collar class and poor-class individuals needed the cash with gold and silver and lower the estimation of the dollar. The subsidence hit numerous individuals abandoning them jobless and a few financial specialists stayed to be traditionalists. The interminable clash between gold (Republican gathering) and silver (Democrats and some Republican individuals) amass was adverse to the economy overall. Be that as it may, the silver gathering in Republican gathering upheld subtly to "Silverite" democrats.

okay but whats the question.

explanation:

the exact role and status of women in the roman world, and indeed in most ancient societies, has often been obscured by the biases of both ancient male writers and 19-20th century ce male scholars, a situation only relatively recently redressed by modern scholarship which has sought to more objectively assess women's status, rights, duties, representation in the arts, and daily lives; and all this from almost exclusively male source material dealing with a male-dominated roman world.

women in mythology

unlike some other ancient cultures such as the greeks who had formed a creation myth where woman was a creature secondary to man and, more specifically, in the form of pandora, a bringer of unhappiness and vices, the romans had a more neutral approach where humanity, and not specifically the male, was created by the gods from earth and water. ovid's metamorphoses, for example, does not specify whether the first human was a man or a woman. at least in a physical sense then men and women were not regarded as belonging to a different species as in the greek world, a view often reiterated in roman medical treatises.