How did andrew carnegie’s response to the homestead strike affect public opinion about him

Andrew Carnegie placed Henry Clay Frick in charge of his company's operations in 1881. Frick wanted to stop unions' presence in the factories; "The workers have never been able to reach the product to which they are owed, because of being stopped by the men of the union," he complained in a letter to Carnegie.

Carnegie was publicly in favor of the unions. He condemned the use of shells and told associates that no steel mill was worth spilling a single drop of blood. However, Carnegie agreed with Frick's idea of destroying unions and "reorganizing the whole thing."

On June 30, 1892, Frick and the AA leaders entered into negotiations. The members of AA demanded a salary increase; Frick responded immediately with a 22% decrease in salary that would affect almost half of the union members and removed several AA members who worked in his factory from their positions. Carnegie encouraged Frick to use the negotiations to dissolve the Union, since Carnegie believed that the AA was an obstacle to effectiveness. He also laid off a large number of employees, admitting a small number of workers who made the Carnegie Steel Company an elitist organization. This put public opinion against him.

yes i think there would be volunteers

1- in bradbury's  fahrenheit 451, all books are banned and burned upon discovery. in the nazi germany, books considered to be subversive to the regime would be burned to keep the population from generating ideologies that could challenge nazism.

2- was bradbury correct in his literal interpretation of  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”? in some way, yes. when knowledge is not only limited, but also controlled, the people tied to it are led to their demise. just like in the novel, people in nazi germany who owned  subversive books were punished not only by the burning of their property, but also by the discrimination that followed after such a public form of consequence. if a person was seen being confiscated  subversive  books, they may be considered as an ally to the jews, which meant pretty much the same as being the enemy back then. because of the extreme exclusion and suffering that followed this punishment, it's almost like dying a slow death.

in this way, the phrase  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.” is both literal and figurative.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!