History
History, 29.01.2020 04:55, mheiser8768

Could some one me with this?

did the alien and sedition acts cause a greater divide between the political parties? explain. is the limitation of the freedoms protected in the bill of rights ever justified for any reason? why or why not?

(assistance)
fifth congress of the united states:
at the second session,
begun and at the city of philadelphia, in the state of pennsylvania, on monday, the thirteenth of november, one thousand seven hundred and ninety-seven.

an act in addition to the act, entitled "an act for the punishment of certain crimes against the united states."

section 1. be it enacted by the senate and house of representatives of the united states of america, in congress assembled, that if any persons shall unlawfully combine or conspire together, with intent to oppose any measure or measures of the government of the united states, which are or shall be directed by proper authority, or to impede the operation of any law of the united states, or to intimidate or prevent any person holding a place or office in or under the government of the united states, from undertaking, performing or executing his trust or duty, and if any person or persons, with intent as aforesaid, shall counsel, advise or attempt to procure any insurrection, riot, unlawful assembly, or combination, whether such conspiracy, threatening, counsel, advice, or attempt shall have the proposed effect or not, he or they shall be deemed guilty of a high misdemeanor, and on conviction, before any court of the united states having jurisdiction thereof, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding five thousand dollars, and by imprisonment during a term not less than six months nor exceeding five years; and further, at the discretion of the court may be holden to find sureties for his good behaviour in such sum, and for such time, as the said court may direct.

sec. 2. and be it farther enacted, that if any person shall write, print, utter or publish, or shall cause or procure to be written, printed, uttered or published, or shall knowingly and willingly assist or aid in writing, printing, uttering or publishing any false, scandalous and malicious writing or writings against the government of the united states, or either house of the congress of the united states, or the president of the united states, with intent to defame the said government, or either house of the said congress, or the said president, or to bring them, or either of them, into contempt or disrepute; or to excite against them, or either or any of them, the hatred of the good people of the united states, or to stir up sedition within the united states, or to excite any unlawful combinations therein, for opposing or resisting any law of the united states, or any act of the president of the united states, done in pursuance of any such law, or of the powers in him vested by the constitution of the united states, or to resist, oppose, or defeat any such law or act, or to aid, encourage or abet any hostile designs of any foreign nation against united states, their people or government, then such person, being thereof convicted before any court of the united states having jurisdiction thereof, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars, and by imprisonment not exceeding two years.

sec. 3. and be it further enacted and declared, that if any person shall be prosecuted under this act, for the writing or publishing any libel aforesaid, it shall be lawful for the defendant, upon the trial of the cause, to give in evidence in his defence, the truth of the matter contained in publication charged as a libel. and the jury who shall try the cause, shall have a right to determine the law and the fact, under the direction of the court, as in other cases.

sec. 4. and be it further enacted, that this act shall continue and be in force until the third day of march, one thousand eight hundred and one, and no longer: provided, that the expiration of the act shall not prevent or defeat a prosecution and punishment of any offence against the law, during the time it shall be in force.

jonathan dayton, speaker of the house of representatives.
theodore sedgwick, president of the sentate pro tempore.

i certify that this act did originate in the sentate.
attest, sam. a. otis, secretary

approved, july 14, 1798
john adams
president of the united states.

answer
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 19:30, carterjpowell77
Which statement best evaluates the impact of the 1929 stock market crash on europe? 1. the united states established high export tariffs to europe that reduced goods exported to germany. 2. the united states promoted domestic policy initiates that reduced jobs on american bases in europe. 3. the united states promoted isolationism that withdrew troops from europe causing germany to pay its own national defense. 4. the united states eliminated loans to europe that caused germany to default on its reparation payments to france.
Answers: 1
image
History, 21.06.2019 21:30, ogsmash81
The clergy comprised the wealthy first estate, with members of noble descent in particular having a great deal of power. what was the score of the clergy’s wealth
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 00:50, joseroblesrivera123
Which of the following statements is true about water access in the middle east? a. access to coastal waters is not important to people. b. most countries depend on outside resources for water. c. water is available in large supplies in all countries. d. all countries have sources of renewable freshwater.
Answers: 3
image
History, 22.06.2019 10:00, bhebert6057
The immigration act of 1924 was considered outdated by the 1960s
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
Could some one me with this?

did the alien and sedition acts cause a greater divide be...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
History, 07.12.2020 05:20
Konu
English, 07.12.2020 05:20
Konu
Mathematics, 07.12.2020 05:20