Read the excerpt from the publius. in framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself. —publius how would federalists most likely respond to this? they would agree but doubt the constitution could make that happen. they would doubt that any central government could meet these goals. they would argue that the government does not need to control itself. they would agree and be confident that the constitution meets those goals.

They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals.

In Federalist No. 47, James Madison (under the pen name of Publius) provides a reason to believe that the constitution could meet the goal of controlling the government.

Madison takes his idea of "separation of power" from Montesquieu, who had written extensively about American democracy. The argument was that if the government was divided in different branches (executive, legislative and judicial), each power would act on the other ones as a control mechanism. The responsibilities of each branch would be contained in the Constitution. This system of "checks and balances" would mean that no power could act on its own, or overpower the other ones, effectively forcing the government to control itself.

The correct answer is D) They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals.

Federalists most likely respond to this in that they would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals.

The Federalists Papers are a series of 85 documents written by Alexander Hamilton, Jhon Jay, and James Madison, under the pseudonym of "Publius." The goal of these papers was to convince the people from New York to ratify the new Constitution. In this case, it was James Madison who wrote the Federalist Paper N.- 47. In the paper, he argues in favor of the new federal structure of the government under a separation of powers in three different branches.

the federalist party which advocated strong centralization dominated the united states government till 1800. so 1800 election transformed the power from one party to another party for the first time and was thus a turning point in american history. so jefferson called it "revolution of 1800".

explanation:

since most of current immigration into the u.s., both legal and illegal, is coming from latin america. it would be very difficult to imagine or rationalize a country my fellow citizens are trying desperately to flee into, would pose a threat to my prosperity or freedom. since the u.s. has a long history of intervention, but no record of permanent occupation, i would not feel oppression is the main objective.  

the largest free trade nation, along with the largest gdp in the world wanting to expand it's economic policy on us, and including us, could only be positive. the u.s. government has no interest in, or way of simply forcing american culture on us. and has no track record of it. other nations that adopted american social culture, or "americanization" did so voluntarily, mainly through the choice of allowing american businesses and u.s. citizens to come into their nations, as free operatives.