Which sentence states a reason that would support a claim in favor of american use of the atomic bomb during world war ii? on august 6, 1945, the us air force dropped an atomic bomb on hiroshima, japan, killing more than 70,000 people. japan’s surrender came just days after the bombing of hiroshima, ending the war and saving countless lives. niels bohr was one of the many physicists who worked at los alamos to develop the atomic bomb. many scientists, including albert einstein, opposed the development and use of further nuclear weapons.

Answer

The sentence, Japan’s surrender came just days after the bombing of Hiroshima, ending the war and saving countless lives.

Explanation

The sentence state a reason that could support a claim in favor of the American use of atomic bomb during world war ii because it made Japan to go into unconditional surrender that was previously pushed by the allies. Truman and his advisors concluded this decision that only bombing a city would make an adequate impression to Japan. The goal of the bombing was to destroy Japan’s ability to make war.

The sentence "Japan's surrender came a just days after the bombing of Hiroshima, ending the war and  saving countless lives" states a reason that would support a claim in favor of American use of atomic bomb during world war II, because it convinced the japan to go into an unconditional surrender which allies had been pushing for. Secondly if the war remained continued for more time, it could have taken countless lives as well.

was a long, primarily nonviolent series of events to bring full civil rights and equality under the law to all americans. the era has had a lasting impact on united states society, in its tactics, the increased social and legal acceptance of civil rights, and in its exposure of the prevalence and cost of racism. in the south violence and fraud in southern elections from 1868 to 1876, which had reduced black voter turnout and enabled southern white democrats to regain power in state legislatures across the south

a hypothesis is an expected answer to a question, usually based on some theory or prior research. hypothesis testing is a method of determining the viability of a hypothesis. let’s use the us presidential election as an example. there are many hypotheses (questions) about how people feel or whom they will vote for. the only way to know the 100% “truth” about the answers to these questions is to ask every single possible voter – something that is impossible, expensive, time consuming etc. instead, we take samples and use statistics to make “best guesses” about the answer to a particular hypothesis. we never know for sure if our conclusion is right at the time we accept/reject it, but these techniques, when used appropriately can get us close to the truth most of the time (which is a lot better than guessing, flipping coins or throwing darts to get answers).

the tricky part about hypothesis testing is that we have to think somewhat backwards about it – we have to test what is known as the “null hypothesis”. as an example, the hypothesis might be “obama is more popular than romney” while the null hypothesis is “there is no difference in popularity between obama and romney”. we focus on the null hypothesis because it tells us exactly what the expected value of our tests should be (obama popularity = romney popularity) and we can collect data and see if it comes out that way (see next section on “significance”). if it does, then we “accept the null hypothesis” and reject our original hypothesis. if the null hypothesis is disproven, we look at the data to see if our original hypothesis holds (obama> romney).