If people have strong human leaders then they do not need a good to tell them what to do ,disagree or agree

I disagree with the statement because according to an Oxford University study led by two academics, believing in God is part of human nature. Humans are naturally predisposed to believe in God. The project involved a number of academics in 20 countries around the world and included disciplines such as anthropology, psychology, and philosophy.  

The study established whether belief in God was simply learned from society or integral to human nature. The co-director of the project said: “We have gathered a body of evidence that suggests that religion is a common fact of human nature across different societies.”  

As a conclusion, I can say that humans will always need their superior inner instinct to guide them in spite of having good leaders who are always subject to failure. Good people always have limitations because they are not perfect while the Creator of all things is perfect and fails not. He abides in every human body’s heart and can tell right from wrong while sometimes human ego can drive leaders to self-seeking motives though well intended. What may be good in the long run for a whole community may be ignored by such leaders because of their own sometimes unconscious egoistic motives. The perfect love and knowledge that abides in every human being will know what is best for all and resorting to such a clean source of knowledge can help the community make democratic decisions instead on relying on a man’s limited trend of thought.  

lewis and clark (i think)

we can argue that appeasement caused world war ii because it allowed hitler and the nazis to build germany’s military power until it was strong enough to fight a major war. additionally, appeasement emboldened germany, making it think the allies would never have the will to fight. this made germany much more aggressive and encouraged it to take the steps that eventually led to war.