The persian wars set the conditions for the peloponnesian war because: athens and sparta fought on opposite sides during the persian wars. the persian wars made athens and sparta too weak to fight off the macedonians. sparta was concerned about the power and wealth athens gained following the persian wars. the persian victory created the conditions for rebellion.

The Persian Wars set the conditions for the Peloponnesian War because Sparta was concerned about the power and wealth Athens gained following the Persian Wars. Despite the fact that the Greeks combined, under the leadership of Sparta and Athens, defeated the Persians, they were not able to maintain their unity. Athens grew from just another city-state into a major trading and maritime power, that dominated the trade routes in the eastern Mediterranean and came out as a great Empire, breaking the balance of power. Traditionally,  Sparta was the greatest military power in Greece. The rise of Athens meant that there were two great powers in old Greece and they became divided into a battlefield between these two city-states.

could you give me the options ?

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is