Which would be good historical evidence when studying manifest destiny? a. a chart showing the louisiana purchase in current dollars b. a food log showing what settlers ate c. a street map of new orleans d. the louisiana purchase treaty

The correct answer is D. A good historical evidence when studying Manifest Destiny would be the Louisiana Purchase treaty.

Explanation:

The Louisiana Purchase was a commercial transaction whereby Napoleon Bonaparte, then French First Consul, sold in 1803 529,911,680 acres of French possessions in North America to the United States at a price of about 3 cents per acre; a total price of 15 million dollars or 80 million French francs. With interest, Louisiana's territory cost $ 23,213,568.

The Louisiana Purchase was framed in the process of American expansionism that took place in the 1800s. This expansionist process had its ideological foundation in the Doctrine of Manifest Destiny, which advocated the expansion of the United States from the shores of the Atlantic to the Pacific Ocean.

im not sure

step-by-step explanation: s

since most of current immigration into the u.s., both legal and illegal, is coming from latin america. it would be very difficult to imagine or rationalize a country my fellow citizens are trying desperately to flee into, would pose a threat to my prosperity or freedom. since the u.s. has a long history of intervention, but no record of permanent occupation, i would not feel oppression is the main objective.  

the largest free trade nation, along with the largest gdp in the world wanting to expand it's economic policy on us, and including us, could only be positive. the u.s. government has no interest in, or way of simply forcing american culture on us. and has no track record of it. other nations that adopted american social culture, or "americanization" did so voluntarily, mainly through the choice of allowing american businesses and u.s. citizens to come into their nations, as free operatives.