Need historians are concerned with accuracy of their writings and readings but are also aware of a.) inability of authors to know every cause and consequence of every story. b.) biases, perspectives, beliefs, and a variety of other differences. c.) history being told by one person at a time d.) no one being totally accurate, as hard as we try.

a.) inability of authors to know every cause and consequence of every story.

Explanation:

Historians are concerned with accuracy in their writings. In general, all authors want their work to reflect reality as correctly as possible. However, authors are also aware of their inability to know every cause and consequence of every story. Their inability to be informed of every detail of a story means that they might miss some event that was significant to the time period they are studying.

i believe it would be capitalism

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.