Both india and vietnam experienced periods of chaos and conflict following the success of their independence movements. how did these conflicts differ?   for apex.

While it is true that both India and Vietnam suffered moments of social and political turmoil during their independence processes, with civilian casualties and great social consequences, there is a big difference between the two conflicts and the way they ended: India gained its independence through of non-violent methods, guided by leaders like Mahatma Ghandi, this nation led peaceful protests, strikes, symbolic demonstrations and all kinds of calls for attention to Britain but not including any type of aggression within them. Vietnam, on the other hand, faced its colonizer, France, through guerrilla warfare, in a conflict that extended from 1946 to 1954 and culminated in the independence of Vietnam and the subsequent division of the country, which led to the Vietnam War.

peasants’ war, (1524–25) peasant uprising in germany inspired by changes brought by the reformation, peasants in western and southern germany invoked   divine law to demand agrarian rights and freedom from oppression by nobles and landlords. as the uprising spread, some peasant groups organized armies. although the revolt was supported huldrych zwingli and thomas müntzerits condemnation by martain luther contributed to its defeat, principally by the army of the swabian league. some 100,000 peasants were killed. reprisals and increased restrictions discouraged further attempts to improve the peasants’ plight.

i think it would be " a" i might be wrong tho