Why did the supreme court support the injunction in the youngstown sheet and tube company v. sawyer case? a. the disagreed with the steel mill owners. b. they put limits on the workers right to strike. c. they supported constitutional separation of powers. d. they affirmed truman's executive order. e. they supported the need for steel during a war.

C.They supported Constitutional separation of powers.

Explanation:

The case of Youngstown Sheet and Tube company vs Sawyer was a milestone when it comes to separation of powers and limiting the power of the executive by the supreme court, the Supreme court made the decision to limit the ability of the President of the United States to seize private property without consent from the congress, after this ruling the president has had to ask permission to the congress when it comes to seizing private property no matter for what does the country need it.

several states had passed similar laws, but they were limited to intrastate businesses. the sherman antitrust act was based on the constitutional power of congress to regulate interstate commerce.

you answered my friends question just to get the coins you didn't even give a valid response.

southerners, for their part, considered brown a terrorist. they felt threatened by northerners' deification of brown and worried about the potential for other, similar armed insurrections.

explanation: