History
History, 18.07.2019 22:30, philkas414

In gertz v. robert welch (1974), the supreme court opinion wrote that there is a "social interest in order and morality" in preventing false speech. protecting false speech constitutionally may damage this order and morality. a false statement damages both the subject of the falsehood and the listener who hears the false statement. by constitutionally protecting these statements, we protect a person's ability to create disorder. the justice argues that protecting false speech may protect morality. prevent disorder. damage order in society. harm listeners to speech.

answer
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 21:00, Lalawhite1082
What do you think was a drawback to this method of calculating distance
Answers: 2
image
History, 21.06.2019 22:40, vanessafalcon1198
An alliance of two political parties is know as? a. majority b. coalition c. candidate d. government
Answers: 2
image
History, 21.06.2019 23:00, 20calzoy
Why did the other allies like great britain and france not support wilsons 14 points?
Answers: 3
image
History, 21.06.2019 23:30, simran1049
What development led the soviet union to establish the warsaw pact? the soviets gained control over satellite countries. west germany joined nato. the allied powers grew weaker. the berlin wall was erected between east and west germ
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
In gertz v. robert welch (1974), the supreme court opinion wrote that there is a "social interest in...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Computers and Technology, 06.09.2021 23:30
Konu
Mathematics, 06.09.2021 23:30