You are looking for part-time employment and posted your résumé to an online job site. one day you receive an e-mail from a company whose name you do not recognize. the person claims that the company needs orders processed, and that to get started, you simply need to fill out the paperwork, attached, provide your contact and personal information, and return it. to ensure your safety, the best next step is to a. fill out the form and send it back immediately to start working b. send an e-mail that contains questions you have about the position and your personal information, such as your phone number and address, so that they can contact you c. do some research on the company and contact the company to verify that the position is legitimate before giving out your personal information d. give the company your home address hoping they will stop by to do an in-house interview

Ascientist finds an organism that cannot move it has many cells produces spores and gets food from its environment in which kingdom does it belong explains

Hi i need comment on my homework or something to add. *argue for and against quantitative and qualitative techniques respectively. which ones would you lean towards when conducting an investigation and why?   quantitative techniques, usually presented through surveys, are more practical, take less time, and can design samples in which any person or household of the target audience has the same probability of participating. however, the questionnaires must be carefully written by highly trained professionals, in such a way that they do not contain ambiguous or biased questions, that they are easily understandable by any member of the sample, and that they contemplate all the objectives of the research. besides that they do not allow to deepen in the reason of the facts. qualitative techniques, on the other hand, are based on the observation of natural behaviors, discourses, open responses for the subsequent interpretation of meanings. studying reality in its natural context can be extremely useful to learn more about the phenomenon studied. however, more specialization is required, they are not applicable to statistics, so it is not possible to make measurements, it entails a higher cost per studied population (which is also reduced), whose results do not necessarily represent the general population. i believe that knowing the situation of the general population, through statistics is essential. in addition, because of the possibility of studying a much larger population in less time and with less amount of economic resources, i would lean towards quantitative research.

What is the most common blood type in the u. s.?