Felisha loves the Dallas Cowboys. Her cousin, Eddie, doesn't. Felisha a is trying to convince him that they are going to win the Super Bowl this year. Felisha states: " The Cowboys are " America’s Team’ for a reason. They have a long history of winning games. They have a huge fan base. They are one of the best teams in the NFC East division this year. And with their new recruits, they are bound to dominate on defense. All the sports analysts are predicting a fantastic season, and -ask any fan- we are Super Bowl bound, baby!" Evaluate the worthiness of this argument and explain your position ( Hint: Apply the four test.) 2. Evaluate the argument for reasoning errors. Explain what they are, or not. why it’s a reasonable argument. 3.isit sound or unsound valid or invalidi

Astudy shows that an influenza vaccine is 71.4% effective in preventing a particular type of influenza. if 15,422 people receive the vaccine, how many would not be protected and would be likely to get infulenza?

Hi i need comment on my homework or something to add. *argue for and against quantitative and qualitative techniques respectively. which ones would you lean towards when conducting an investigation and why?   quantitative techniques, usually presented through surveys, are more practical, take less time, and can design samples in which any person or household of the target audience has the same probability of participating. however, the questionnaires must be carefully written by highly trained professionals, in such a way that they do not contain ambiguous or biased questions, that they are easily understandable by any member of the sample, and that they contemplate all the objectives of the research. besides that they do not allow to deepen in the reason of the facts. qualitative techniques, on the other hand, are based on the observation of natural behaviors, discourses, open responses for the subsequent interpretation of meanings. studying reality in its natural context can be extremely useful to learn more about the phenomenon studied. however, more specialization is required, they are not applicable to statistics, so it is not possible to make measurements, it entails a higher cost per studied population (which is also reduced), whose results do not necessarily represent the general population. i believe that knowing the situation of the general population, through statistics is essential. in addition, because of the possibility of studying a much larger population in less time and with less amount of economic resources, i would lean towards quantitative research.

Can someone give me one specific health problem (within unhealthy eating) and explain it. !