Which step is irrelevant to investigating a foodborne-illness outbreak? A.
identifying people affected by the outbreak in the investigation
B.
finding the source of food and point of contamination
C.
generating hypotheses for the outbreak
D.
firing employees before the investigation

Ithink the correct answer would be that since the disease is passed by a hand shake and can be cured with antibiotics that it could be an infection. an example could be that once when i was working in a bush camp, i got blood poisoning from blood blisters that got infected. our cook did not wash his hands after going to the bathroom and he passed staphyloccus on to the crew he fed. one other person also got a bad similar infection on the side of his face. i had to be rescued by helicopter and taken to the hospital so i wouldn't die!