Do you like my poem? Mystery Man

It was all a rush.
My love struck like an arrow.
I fell in love.

Not knowing it was a trap.
I was wishing for freedom.
Scared that he might not love me.
But hoping for love…

Too soon I was all alone in the darkroom.
Scared and with no way out.
Fearing that the mystery man might be back.
For when the mystery man came back.
The pain was sure to come.
Fear stabbed my gut.
For I could hear my enslaver slowly step by step coming closer.

My heart was on fire.
As my enslaver stripped me down into nothing.
I felt his skin on my body.
So hairy and strong.

I knew as his lips went up and down.
Tracing my body.
If I ran he would kill me.

But soon I would escape.
I would think of a plan.
But for now, I'm praying for help.
Is good enough, so please send help.
I will wait for you.

Which disease is caused by a buildup of plaque in blood ves

Hi i need comment on my homework or something to add. *argue for and against quantitative and qualitative techniques respectively. which ones would you lean towards when conducting an investigation and why?   quantitative techniques, usually presented through surveys, are more practical, take less time, and can design samples in which any person or household of the target audience has the same probability of participating. however, the questionnaires must be carefully written by highly trained professionals, in such a way that they do not contain ambiguous or biased questions, that they are easily understandable by any member of the sample, and that they contemplate all the objectives of the research. besides that they do not allow to deepen in the reason of the facts. qualitative techniques, on the other hand, are based on the observation of natural behaviors, discourses, open responses for the subsequent interpretation of meanings. studying reality in its natural context can be extremely useful to learn more about the phenomenon studied. however, more specialization is required, they are not applicable to statistics, so it is not possible to make measurements, it entails a higher cost per studied population (which is also reduced), whose results do not necessarily represent the general population. i believe that knowing the situation of the general population, through statistics is essential. in addition, because of the possibility of studying a much larger population in less time and with less amount of economic resources, i would lean towards quantitative research.

Which of these is likely to be the best source of valid health information?