The chart lists patient information and some vital signs of three patients. A 2-column table with 3 rows. Column 1 is labeled Patients with entries Sandra, Carlos, Francis. Column 2 is labeled Patient Information with entries Age 20, Pulse 50 beats per minute, Respiration 16 breaths per minute, Blood-oxygen 85%; Age 9, Pulse 95 beats per minute, Respiration 28 breaths per minute, Blood-oxygen 98%; Age:55, Pulse 115 beats per minute, Respiration 18 breaths per minute, Blood-oxygen 90%.

Which best explains the patients issues based on their vital signs?

A. Sandra is hyperoxic and experiencing tachycardia, Carlos has normal levels for a child, and Francis is experiencing brachycardia.
B. Sandra is hypoxic and experiencing brachycardia, Carlos has normal levels for a child, and Francis is experiencing tachycardia.
C. Sandra is hyperoxic and experiencing brachycardia, Carlos shows abnormal levels for a child, and Francis is experiencing tachycardia.
D. Sandra is hypoxic and experiencing tachycardia, Carlos shows abnormal levels for a child, and Francis is experiencing brachycardia.

Anyone who can chat with me right now? i m very bored.

Acoastal community is drafting a plan in case of a hurricane. which action is an appropriate element for an effective plan? 1.) creating a map of areas that are not affected by storm surge 2.) plotting the location of all fire hydrants along major travel routes 3.) relocating any individuals who might be affected by the disaster 4.) identifying multiple evacuation routes for each area of the community

Hi i need comment on my homework or something to add. *argue for and against quantitative and qualitative techniques respectively. which ones would you lean towards when conducting an investigation and why?   quantitative techniques, usually presented through surveys, are more practical, take less time, and can design samples in which any person or household of the target audience has the same probability of participating. however, the questionnaires must be carefully written by highly trained professionals, in such a way that they do not contain ambiguous or biased questions, that they are easily understandable by any member of the sample, and that they contemplate all the objectives of the research. besides that they do not allow to deepen in the reason of the facts. qualitative techniques, on the other hand, are based on the observation of natural behaviors, discourses, open responses for the subsequent interpretation of meanings. studying reality in its natural context can be extremely useful to learn more about the phenomenon studied. however, more specialization is required, they are not applicable to statistics, so it is not possible to make measurements, it entails a higher cost per studied population (which is also reduced), whose results do not necessarily represent the general population. i believe that knowing the situation of the general population, through statistics is essential. in addition, because of the possibility of studying a much larger population in less time and with less amount of economic resources, i would lean towards quantitative research.