Which city would most likely be an epicenter of an earthquake san francisco california was saint paul minnesota explain your answer

Option (1)

Explanation:

The city of San Francisco has the highest possibility to be an epicenter of an earthquake. This city is directly related to the most famous and well known destructive fault which is commonly known as the San Andreas fault.

The San Andreas fault was initiated due to the formation of transform plate boundary. Here, the North American plate and the Pacific plate slide passes each other, resulting in the occurrence of shallow focus destructive earthquakes. The city of San Francisco is located just adjacent to this fault which forms the epicenter of the earthquakes that frequently occurs in these region.

Thus, the correct answer is option (1).

i would expect light rain in pittsburgh throughout the following 24 to 48 hours. the lower/falling weights in urban areas toward the west demonstrate that a low weight framework is moving from west to east toward pittsburgh. low weight frameworks are ordinarily connected with precipitation. the way that you don't see a major drop in temperature in the more western urban areas demonstrates the low weight framework is moving with a warm front, so just light rain would be normal. substantial downpours or progressively vicious climate is just typically connected with chilly fronts, where the warm air is pushed up and over a cool front quickly. this quickly rising air (convection) is what gives you heavier torrential downpours, and other conceivably serious weather conditions.

they were destroyed coming out of the civil war but after he war they were booming. if you need an in-depth answer follow up with me  

down below