"Most of the money we're investing as part of this plan will get out the door immediately and go directly to job-creation, generating or saving three to
four million new jobs. And the vast majority of these jobs will be created in the private sector-because, as theses CEOs well know, business, not
government is the engine of growth in this country. But even as this plan puts Americans back to work today, it will also make those critical
investments in alternative energy and safer roads, better health care and modem schools that will lay the foundation for long-term growth and
prosperity And it will invest in broadband and emerging technologies because that is how America will retain and regain its competitive edge in the
21st century"
Read the quotation above, an excerpt from a speech by a US public official The statement most directly reflects which of the following economic
principles and contradicts which other?
Adam Smith's free enterprise, Karl Marx's social equity
Adam Smith's minimal but progressive taxation, John Maynard Keynes's government responsibility
John Maynard Keynes's government responsibility, Adam Smith's free enterprse
Karl Marx's social equity, John Keynes's government responsibility

It is useful for historians to write narratives so that history can be passed on from their point of view.  think about a story being told in third person, then think about it again being told in first person, by someone who actually experienced the event.

The answer is a for sure

As someone who have lived in northern moravia at industrial steel and coal city of ostrava, the closest point is b), but it is questionable. i am not sure how to compare efficiency of largest steel mill in czech republic in comparison to china which is the biggest exporter, but czech steel factories were modernized and run more efficient that 25-35 years ago, and been privatized and owned by mittal. the workforce had been shrinking, so not exactly sure what that c is pointing to (aging of workforce, size of it, or quality). northern moravia is a part of larger coal basin that extend to poland with large coal deposits. this was foundation for the steel industry in the 1800's together with large ore deposits that was mined in proximity of the beskidy mountains less than 25 miles from ostrava. the iron ore mines had been depleted for several decades, and since the late 70's when communists run the country, they were already importing soviet iron ore. coal mining within city of ostrava cased to exist in the 1990's due environmental issues, and also cost. the mines were getting deeper and more costly to operate and there is no more mining within ostrava. couple mines are still in operation in karvina county which is next to ostrava. currently the coal deposits south of the city were not opened due environmental issue which would mean destruction of third largest mountain range in the country. therefore, my conclusion is is b, as the ore and coal resources been shrinking. the biggest challenge not mentioned here is of course competition from russia, ukraine, and china, which can produce steel much cheaper.