In cato's letters, the authors declare that "without freedom of thought there can be no such thing as wisdom, and no such thing as public liberty, without freedom of speech." explain how freedom of thought and speech were not absolute rights in eighteenth-century british america. use the trial of zenger to illustrate the limits of freedom of speech. how does cato's letters enlarge the sphere of liberty for the colonists.

Answer and Explanation:

English like the antiquated Greeks had forced a few confinements on the discourse, for example, dissidence implies the analysis of the administration, maligning implies an analysis of people and impiety meaning analysis of religion and they called them "slanders". As this English men relocated to North America they carried with them the English law, however there was a wide disparity between the Theory and practice between the composed laws and the laws as applied.

Colonial assemblies passed various resolutions directing discourse, yet they were never been authorized by the imperial governors nor by the nearby courts, following the renowned instance of John Peter Zenger homesteader set up truth as a guard to any charge of any slander. One can in any case be charged in the event that he censured the legislature or its authorities, the guard could display reality for those announcements, and it'll be dependent upon the jury to decide it's legitimacy.

this is a dumb website you do not know anything fool

explanation: