This passage: by the way, this difference between us remains much the same to this very day. franz kafka, "letter to his father" what does this statement lead you to believe about the conflict between kafka and his father? a. the conflict continued even after kafka reached adulthood. b. the conflict was not really a big deal to kafka. c. the conflict ended soon after kafka's graduation. d. the conflict gave kafka ideas for his short stories.

The right answer is "A.The conflict continued even after Kafka reached adulthood".

Between November 10 and 19, 1919, Franz Kafka, dissatisfied with the cold paternal reception on the announcement of his engagement to Julie Wohryzek, wrote to his father a long letter with more than a hundred manuscript pages. In the letter, which was never sent to the original recipient, Kafka lays bare all his grief, which lasted from childhood to adulthood, in relation to the authoritarian father, whom he alternately calls "tyrant", "regent" , "king" and "God". In a virtuosic experience of self-analysis, in addition to a beautiful piece of literature, he shows how, in his view, the paternal yoke undermined his self-esteem, condemning him to a weak and frightened personality.

idk but i did find this

explanation:

in the story of the cowardly lion and the hungry tiger, we first see the two characters inside the empty throne room of ozma, bored and sadly very much aware of their uselessness as guardians. they talked about the good old days when they used to be feared. they proceeded to make up stories of how fearsome they were. the cowardly lion professed that he can tear men/women into pieces, while the hungry tiger said he would eat fat babies. but when they proceeded to act upon their words they were forced to realize that they were indeed harmless and good animals who would rather be called cowardly and hungry than harm a woman or eat a child.

given the fact that the question is about the detail that best support the idea that oppressive leaders use   propaganda to achieve thir goals,   the first option does not refer to any kind of propaganda, since it only tells about that the milk and the windfall apple should be reserved for the pigs. in the second option, that is, "snowball and napoleon sent out flights of pigeons whose instructions were to mingle with the animals on the neighbouring farms, tell them the story of the rebellion, and teach them the tune of "beasts of england". it can be identified that the oppressors make use of the propaganda, which is represented by the pigeons, and the information they have to tell other animals about what was happening in the farm in order to get their objectives. for that reason, the right answer is the second option, taking into account that the third option do not refer to propaganda since it only talks about that they did not want jones back. and, finally, the last option refers to the result of the given news, but it does not mean about the propaganda they used to achieve their goals.