Which different interpretation of the icarus myth does jack gilbert offer?

mark branliest

explanation:

the film includes a female character. in the short story, you can fantasize over, the appearance of the characters, the place of origin of events described in this book, you can imagine absolutely your reality described in a short story. and in the film for you already invented everything, characters, the place of the event.

the sentence that best describes the tone of the passage from the radio broadcast compared to the passage from the book is b. the radio broadcast has a more surprised tone.

consider the text evidence: in the passage from the book, the description is more matter-of-fact. it is simply describing the things resembling little grey snakes, but there is no urgency in the description. on the other hand, in the passage from the radio broadcast, there is definetely urgency (you can tell from the expression used, "good heavens", which clearly indicates surprise.)