Look at the five sentences below. they are all about the same topic. by comparing them, which sentence would you conclude to be biased? 1roughly ten illegal immigrants are caught at the border each day. 2in ten days, about one hundred illegal immigrants were stopped at the border. 3says agent radcliffe, "at my post, less than fifteen illegal immigrants are caught daily." 4a ridiculously high number of illegal immigrants are caught at the border every day. 5the border patrol estimates that about ten illegal immigrants are caught at the border each day, for everyone caught, the bp estimates that six get away.

4- A ridiculously high number of illegal immigrants are caught at the border every day.

Explanation:

Remember that something that is biased is showing unreasonable like or dislike for something based on personal opinion, in other words, it tends to be subjective. In this case, all sentences, except the number 4, are telling us facts. They present the information as they found it, without any emotional charge, they limit themselves to present the data and information given by authorities. The fourth sentence uses the word "ridiculously" which shows us that the author has already taken a position towards the issue, the authors think that the amount of immigrants caught is unreasonable high, expressing an opinion.  

many were disgusted, nauseated and shook their heads with disapproval upon finding out about the recycling of water process. however, they do not seem to understand that this process actually saves water.

although individuals may argue that it is unhealthy, and or unsafe to drink water that is "from toilet to tap" , the water is 100% safe to drink and involves forcing the water across a membrane, which "removes   any impurities, including viruses, pharmaceuticals and dissolved minerals" , according to paul rozin, a psychology professor who studies revulsion.

i agree that that the thought of drinking water that once ran through someones kitchen sink isn't quite appealing, but recycled wastewater is safe to drink. it also saves water. "the city produces nine million gallons a day" claims russell schreiber, the city’s director of public works.

recycled waste water has absolutely no health concerns whatsoever. when wastewater goes into a system, it's absorbed back into the ground. thus, it goes into a sewer system, then goes through a treatment process that removes contaminants before being released. nonetheless, there is no problem in drinking water that has been recycled.

"in drought-ed california, there are six state agencies that use wastewater that comes from an intellectual property source," according to the university of california, riverside. studies show that this water is completely safe to drink, however, it still doesn't mean people are going to happily pour it in a water glass.

researchers hope it "may make consumers more amenable to drinking recycled wastewater," extraordinarily, women who have a higher "disgust reaction" and make most consumer purchasing decisions.

i think the answer is c