which rules for handling criticism are being followed in the following scenario? select all that apply."gina, i want to talk to you about the article you turned in yesterday. your style is very entertaining, but i think you need to do a little more research. the part about the costs seemed vague. that would be good information for our readers to have.""oh, i'm sorry. i didn't think about that, but it's a good idea. i can put that in. can i get it back to you tomorrow? ""that'll be great. "rule 1: listen and think; don't hear and react when receiving criticism. rule 2: praise in public; correct in private. rule 3: balance criticism with encouragement. rule 4: admit your faults. rule 5: use "i-language."rule 6: be specific.

that a few simple words can whet the mind's appetite to further explore.

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)