How does midnight assassin differ from the primary source article "she prepares to fight" in its portrayal of mrs. hossack? the excerpt portrays mrs. hossack only as cold and hateful, while the article presents multiple images of her. the excerpt portrays mrs. hossack as warm and compassionate, while the article presents an image of her as vengeful and cruel. the article portrays mrs. hossack as weak and frail, while the excerpt presents an image of her as strong and determined. the article portrays mrs. hossack as only potentially dangerous, while the excerpt presents two very different images of her.

Explanation:

It was composed by somebody who was translating the preliminary. Essential sources are direct experience. Then, an auxiliary source is a point at which somebody tuning in to the individual affirm, records what occurred. The document being composed is the optional source.

idk

explanation:

sensory details?

so i`m assuming you are writing something from a bats (the animal) point of view. if this is the case, you can use sights, sounds, feelings, and tastes.

and idk what you mean by domain, but all of the sensory details will depend on where the bat is.

a bat doesn't see color very well, so its surroundings will be dulled.

it can hear super well. so maybe it can hear the insects on the ground

feelings. you can imagine how a bat would feel from its perspective. it all depends on where it lives.

maybe it can taste the salt in the air, or smell water, or something. all of these details are completely dependent on where it is located.

hope this .