Me! you must explain your answer! read the excerpt from "ellis island.” sometimes people’s surnames were changed. bietzy to peachey. hecht to heck. many americans can point to the fact that their family names are different from their original spelling in the "old country.” it is commonly thought that the clerks at ellis island misunderstood the names or decided to simplify them. which is the best paraphrase of the text? ellis island officers sometimes changed an immigrant’s last name. for example, the name bietzy might be changed to peachey. as a result, today many americans have family names that differ from the original name. the officers may have changed an immigrant’s name because they did not understand it or because they wanted to make the spelling easier. sometimes people’s surnames were changed. bietzy to peachey. hecht to heck. many americans can point to the fact that their family names are different from their original spelling in the “old country.” it is commonly thought that the clerks at ellis island misunderstood the names or decided to simplify them. immigration officers at ellis island sometimes changed an immigrant’s last name. for instance, bietzy might become peachey, while hecht might become heck. immigration officers often changed an immigrant’s name. for example, the name bietzy might be changed to peachey. as a result, many americans have family names that differ from the names of their foreign relatives. this can often make it difficult for some americans to connect to their heritage.

In just over one hundred years, between 1701 and 1810, 252,500 enslaved africans were brought to barbados—an island that occupies only 166 square miles (making it, today, one of the smallest countries in the world). the english then set out to conquer more sugar islands, starting with jamaica, which they took from spain in 1655. in the same period that the 252,500 africans were brought to barbados, 662,400 africans were taken to jamaica. thus, sugar drove more than 900,000 people into slavery, across the atlantic, to barbados and jamaica—and these were just two of the sugar islands. the english were eagerly filling antigua, nevis, saint kitts, and montserrat with slaves and sugar mills. they took over much of dutch guiana for the same reason. seeing the fortunes being made in sugar, the french started their own scramble to turn the half of the island of hispaniola that they controlled (which is now haiti), as well as martinique, guadeloupe, and french guiana (along the south american coast near dutch guiana), into their own sugar colonies, which were filled with hundreds of thousands more african slaves. by 1753, british ships were taking average of 34,250 slaves from africa every year, and by 1768, that number had reached 53,100. –sugar changed the world, marc aronson and marina budhos how do the authors use historical evidence to support their claim? x(a) they use secondary sources to show how french and english monarchs were indifferent to enslaved people. x(b)they use secondary sources to show that enslaved people often fought for their freedom after arriving in the caribbean. the answer is: (c)they use facts from primary sources to show how countries increased the number of enslaved people to produce more sugar. x(d)they use primary source interviews to show that countries could make more money in trading sugar without using enslaved people.