Which of the following describes an advantage primary sources have over secondary sources for a historian?
a. they can a historian focus on important themes rather than on a specific piece of evidence.
b. they can summarize a huge amount of data that a historian could not sort through alone.
c. they can compare and contrast conclusions other historians have made about a time period.
d. they can reveal how individuals experiencing historical events actually reacted.
Answers: 2
Spanish, 25.06.2019 14:30, viktoria1198zz
Answers: 3
History, 30.06.2019 18:00, michael1295
Answers: 1
History, 15.07.2019 08:00, jes69
Answers: 1
History, 13.11.2019 05:31, rosepotato789
Answers: 2
Which of the following describes an advantage primary sources have over secondary sources for a hist...
Biology, 06.04.2020 04:30
Mathematics, 06.04.2020 04:31
English, 06.04.2020 04:31
Mathematics, 06.04.2020 04:31
Mathematics, 06.04.2020 04:31