English Literature Sonnet Poem Can someone help me by just reading this and seeing what I could add into it?

(Verse 1) Summer days spent without a thought of what was to come
Endless days of laughter and fun
No comprehension of time , it was as though we lived - through several lifetimes
Nothing lasts forever , shattered dreams , you left behind

(Verse 2) standing at the window
Wondering whether I should call
Day turns to night , summer to fall
Many months passed no sign of you at all
Deep down I had known it was just memories
I know I could not return , not just yet

(Verse 3) But I see the world so different know
[missing line because I don’t know what to put here]
And love is proved in the letting go
Would it be okay if I come back home to you?

i could not help with your answer but i wanted to help you so i fixed your some of your work to make it more complete so this is it

(Verse 1) Summer days were spent without a thought of what was to come. Endless days of laughter and funThere was no comprehension of time; it was as though we had lived through several lifetimes. Nothing lasts forever, shattered dreams that you have left behind.

(Verse 2) standing at the window. I was wondering whether I should callSummer gives way to fall as the day turns to night.Many months passed with no sign of you at all. Deep down, I knew it was just memories. I knew I could not return, not just yet.

(Verse 3) But I see the world so differently now.[missing line because I don’t know what to put here]And love is proven in letting go. Would it be okay if I came back home to you?

i hope this helped a bet

alliteration is the repetition of the same or similar consonants. having that in mind, i would say that the correct answer is: so shows a snowy dove trooping with crows.

"character is what you are in the dark." dwight lyman moody, in this very witty quotation of his, states we act and think differently when we are "in the dark", that is, when the spotlight is not on us and everyone can see us and consequently judge us. when reading, we tend to be sympathetic to some characters and their dilemmas. by being so, we are saying to ourselves that we agree with those characters' acts and choices, even if they are morally questionable if we have common sense in mind. dwight lyman moody's quotation applies very well to "crime and punishment", by   19th century russian writer fiodor dostoyevsky. raskolnikov, the main character, a former law student who spends his days reflecting upon life and its misery, draws a fatal conclusion: mankind is divided in two main categories: ordinary and extraordinary people. the first are the ones who lead a run-of-the-mill existence and are full of imperfections; the latter are the ones who are spiritually superior, the ones who always know better, and have the right to judge the ordinary ones, as well as eliminate them if for common good. raskolnikov considers himself as belonging to the extraordinary category and decides to kill an old lady who is a money lender and in whose house he rents a small room. raskolnikov compares himself to napoleon, who had the undeniable right to execute tons of people during the war in order to save his nation. of course what the main character decides to do is a horrendous crime, but as readers we feel it is the right thing for him to do, since the victim is a mean old woman who only thinks about money and keeps humiliating her younger sister. what one experiences is a mixture of sympathy and empathy for the character, even though he decides to commit homicide, which is not at all accepted or tolerated by civilized citizens. however, since readers are "in the dark", they allow themselves to feel in ways they would probably never dare to confess to anyone, no matter how nasty or vicious a character can be. after all, they are just reading and doing no harm. in other words, readers are in the dark and can be who they are without being judged.