Here are the questions: 1. What are the benefits of the Pipelines? Explain your answer with evidence from the articles.
2. What are the complications of the pipelines? Explain your answer with evidence from the articles.
3. Is one author more believable than the other? Explain your answer with evidence from the articles.
4. Based upon these two articles, do you believe the pipeline is a good or bad thing? Write a complete paragraph to explain.
5. Write two-three paragraphs comparing the two articles. Make sure you include these things in your comparison:

Title of the article
Opinion of each author
Evidence that shows the opinion of each author.
Two points that show how they are the same
Two points that show how they are different.

I NEED THIS ASAP

1. Domestic Uses.

Commercial/Industrial Uses.

Large Capacity Transportation.

Safer and Continuous Transportation.

Tiny Surface Footprint, Avoidance of Densely Populated Areas.

Shorter Construction Time Frame.

Lower Energy Use, Reduced Transportation Costs.

Environmentally Friendly.

2. The main problems related to the transport of ethanol by pipeline are its corrosive nature and tendency to absorb water and impurities in pipelines, which are not problems with oil and natural gas. Insufficient volumes and cost-effectiveness are other considerations limiting construction of ethanol pipelines.

3. Credible sources are written by authors respected in their fields of study. Responsible, credible authors will cite their sources so that you can check the accuracy of and support for what they've written.

4. Releases of products carried through pipelines can impact the environment and may result in injuries or fatalities as well as property damage. Oil can linger in the environment for many years, even after a cleanup, continuing to affect fish, wildlife, and humans.

5. They are the same because they are both authors. They are different because they write different stuff and they are not the same person.

Explanation:

i would say the correct answer is not concrete.