English
English, 07.12.2021 06:00, whitakers87

In the climax of the novel, the Giver and Jonas formulate a plan to have Jonas escape, thereby flooding everyone in the community with memories; it is also decided that the Giver would stay behind to help the people of the community process their new feelings and experiences. Did Jonas and the Giver have a right to change their community in this way? Why or why not? Make an argument, and support it with evidence from the text. If possible, bring in examples from history and current events to strengthen your argument. Write your response in the box below.

answer
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: English

image
English, 21.06.2019 18:30, JvGaming2001
Critical thinking questions what factors led to the creation and implementation of operation reinhard? how did the residents of the ghettos respond to mass deportations and what occurred when the residents realized what happened to those deported? what did rudolf hoess’s testimony at the end of the war suggest about the final solution and planned deportation and resettlement? how did operation reinhard differ from earlier nazi actions and how was it similar? was resettlement seriously considered and why was it not used?
Answers: 3
image
English, 21.06.2019 23:10, ibrahimharoon
How does the author create a surprise ending? cite evidence from the text to support your answer.
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 01:00, Tibbit94
Review rachel’s planned video presentation outline and answer the question
Answers: 3
image
English, 22.06.2019 05:30, babydolltia28
How did rick respond to this conflict
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
In the climax of the novel, the Giver and Jonas formulate a plan to have Jonas escape, thereby flood...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 21.12.2019 05:31
Konu
Mathematics, 21.12.2019 05:31