How does the author of “The Journey to Acceptance” show a favorable bias toward Mendel’s research and an unfavorable bias toward the opinions of Mendel’s scientific peers? A.) The author contrasts Mendel’s theories against the theories of the scientists of Mendel’s day.

B.) The author does not spend equal time explaining the theories of Mendel’s scientific peers.

C.) The author uses specific diction such as “profound impact” when referencing Mendel’s work and “very small understanding” when expressing the scientists’ beliefs.

D.) The author shows how the scientists’ blending theory is similar to Mendel’s research and then refers to Mendel’s work as “the laws of Mendelian inheritance”, making it sound important.

you can infer that to folke dude was spying for allied nations

a. by showing how a character reacts to or interacts with his or her   surroundings

explanation:

the setting reveal information about a character by showing how a character reacts to or interacts with his or her   surroundings.

so are you asking to write a page on why its so wrong?

awnser: the oxford dictionary of quotations (oup 1970) has 66 pages of quotations

attributed to the writings of william shakespeare in which there are 2369 quotations,

which may reflect well over 5000 speeches, discussions, observations and comments

that are present in shakespeare’s work. it is largely from those speeches and discussions

on shakespeare’s 37 plays, as well as his, and others’ poems, that examples have been

taken here.

in this book all quotations from his poems and plays have been taken from various

editions of the arden shakespeare.

the writer is very much indebted to the rapid response provided by his son, henry

audley-charles , for cries of , guidance, advice and repairs to his ageing pc, that

henry provided at all hours. without this assistance over the last 3 years this book

could not have been written.

in addition, the writer is much for the kind by discussion and proof readings from

elizabeth macbeth and janet hulse; and for his knowledge of shakespeare’s plays and

poems in discussions with monsieur francis saillart; and especially for years of proof

reading, support and with this book from my wife brenda amy cordeiro. above

all, the debt i owe is to professor david price, vice provost research. he has acted as

the editor and the guide for the whole project. this has been far from easy with

changes repeatedly being made by the author and which continued after professor price

had provided all the editorial structure for this project.