English
English, 01.12.2021 20:00, Nathaliasmiles

Which evidence from the text best supports the answer in Part A? "Coral reefs are crucial parts of underwater ecosystems."

"Reef ecosystems on many islands are already stressed by coastal development and pollution."

"Acidic water makes it harder for corals to get calcium. They need calcium for their shells to grow."

"Coral reefs in most climates can only handle temperatures as high as 84 degrees Fahrenheit."

answer
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: English

image
English, 22.06.2019 03:00, danthehero56
Is directly communicated and requires little interpretation
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 04:00, leneenmarshall3125
What can the reader infer about the fears and values of the ancient greeks based on this description of the cyclops’s island?
Answers: 2
image
English, 22.06.2019 07:20, savthespice
Read the excerpts from “take the tortillas out of your poetry” and “speaking arabic.” my friend had concluded that if he took his language and culture out of his poetry, he stood a better chance of receiving a fellowship. he took out his native language, the poetic patois of our reality, the rich mixture of spanish, english, pachuco and street talk which we know so well. in other words, he took the tortillas out of his poetry, which is to say he took the soul out of his poetry. at a neighborhood fair in texas, somewhere between the german oom-pah sausage stand and the mexican gorditas booth, i overheard a young man say to his friend, “i wish i had a heritage. sometimes i feel—so lonely for one.” and the tall american trees were dangling their thick branches right down over his head. which best states how the structures of both excerpts support ideas about cultural diversity? each incorporates non-english words. each incorporates academic words. each incorporates offensive words. each incorporates nonsense words.
Answers: 3
image
English, 22.06.2019 16:30, yyyyyyyyy9462
Which sentence best uses transitions to explain how the evidence supports the reason in the accompanying claim statement? clearly, rainsford did not kill zaroff in self-defense. this statement, therefore, shows that rainsford killed zaroff in self-defense. so, rainsford is not justified because there is no proof he acted in self-defense. in the end, rainsford is not justified in killing zaroff.
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
Which evidence from the text best supports the answer in Part A? "Coral reefs are crucial parts of...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 26.02.2020 22:52