INTRODUCTION 1. Introduce the subject of your critique – the

reading under analysis. Make sure to name the

work being reviewed, as well as the date when

it was created, as well as the name of the

creator.

2. Describe the main argument or purpose of

the work.

3. Explain the context in which the work was

created. This can be a social or political context.

Review the background facts or issues that

must be understood before the point of the

reading can be appreciated: significance,

design, appeal, and so on.

You may also discuss the place of the work in a

creative or academic tradition, or the

relationship between the work and creator’s life

experience.

4. Review the assumptions in the reading that

must be understood before you take a position.

5. Make an umbrella statement that can give the

reader a sign as to what your evaluation is going

to be. For instance, it may indicate whether it is

positive, negative, or a mixed evaluation. In

doing this, make your position statement clear:

what is your evaluation? On what basis are you

making it, given what you have stated in #3 and

#4?

BODY

6. The critical evaluation section

What different elements of the work were

evaluated?

1.

2.

3.

Was the critique writer able to provide evidence

from the work itself? Give examples.

CONCLUSION

7. State your conclusions, reminding the reader

of the points you have made and your reasons

for making them.

And are the two main components of poems that you need to be capable of making inferences and drawing conclusions about. and are the two main components of poems that you need to be capable of making inferences and drawing conclusions about. think its facts and clues

Brainliest asap!me : ) has anyone read the poem, no, love is not dead? ? i have a question about it .. : )

Read this passage from alan weisman's "the city without us": he props his running shoe against the whitish bark of a chinese amur cork tree, growing among the last of the hemlocks. "this may sound blasphemous, but maintaining biodiversity is less important than maintaining a functioning ecosystem. what matters is that soil is protected, that water gets cleaned, that trees filter the air, that a canopy regenerates new seedlings to keep nutrients from draining away into the bronx river." now read this passage from jared diamond's "the ends of the world as we know them": both the shoguns and the japanese peasants took a long-term view: the former expected to pass on their power to their children, and the latter expected to pass on their land. . today, despite having the highest human population density of any large developed country, japan is more than 70 percent forested. what common theme of green literature is most strongly evident in both passages? a. in order to thrive in coming centuries, people must find viable alternatives to fossil fuels, such as coal. b. with careful and intelligent management, ecosystems can still thrive after human beings have changed them. c. in order meet their goals, environmentalists must people develop a personal desire to protect nature. d. there is no excuse for damaging the natural world, and anyone who does so will pay a steep price.