Which statement from the Tinker v. Des Moines court decision best supports the reasoning that the conduct of the student protesters was within the
protection of the free speech clause of the First Amendment?
A. Neither students nor teachers shed their constitutional rights to
freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.
B. In wearing the armbands, the students were quiet and passive,
were not disruptive and did not infringe upon the rights of others.
C. First Amendment rights are available to teachers and students,
subject to application in light of the special characteristics of the
school environment.
D. Three public school pupils in Des Moines, Iowa, were suspended
from school for wearing black armbands to protest the
Government's policy in Vietnam.

orwell was frustrated by his position due to constant teasing by the burmese people.

explanation: smple

paine is arguying that they had tried everything before coming to the conclusion that they needed to fight for their freedom.

argument: "every quiet method for peace hath been ineffectual."

claim 1: "our prayers have been rejected with disdain; and only tended to convince us, that nothing flatters vanity, or confirms obstinacy in kings more than repeated petitioning and nothing hath contributed more than that very measure to make the kings of europe absolute."

claim 2: "wherefore, since nothing but blows will do, for god’s sake, let us come to a final separation, and not leave the next generation to be cutting throats, under the violated unmeaning names of parent and child."

im pretty sure a would be the answer

you did not put the article. so i cannot answer the question.